News

This page features excerpts from news about environmental justice advocacy in the San Joaquin Valley and links to their original sources. Use the features on the right to sort by topic, news source, date, key word or author. You may also subscribe to receive the news by e-mail or through an rss reader. Please note that links to original sources may expire over time.

Global Warming Law Shifts Responsibility from Polluters to Communities

AB32, passed in 2006, mandates that the state reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The law is hailed as landmark environmental legislation for its aggressive action to reduce global warming emissions while “generating jobs, promoting a growing, clean-energy economy and a healthy environment for California at the same time.”

It wouldn’t be surprising if leading-edge environmental legislation like AB32 were to draw fire from climate-change deniers and tea-partiers who undoubtedly see it as a challenge to the god-given right to pollute; indeed, the last attempt to derail the law was last year’s California Proposition 23, pushed by the oil lobby and roundly defeated by grassroots climate justice groups.

But the lawsuit against AB32 was undertaken by the Center for Race, Poverty and the Environment (CRPE) and Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) — two groups that advocate on behalf of low-income people and people of color who live, work and play in the shadow of refineries in Wilmington and Richmond, in the agro-toxic fields of the Central Valley, near the waste-dumps of Kettleman City, and in other California communities plagued by industrial pollution.

{ 0 comments }

Mothers’ Pesticide Exposure Linked To Kids’ IQs

Scientists report that children exposed before birth to a common class of pesticides can have lower IQ levels when they reach school age. The pesticides, known as organophosphates, are widely used in agriculture.

The new data come from three independent studies published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

One study, from California, involved several hundred women and children who live on or near farms where pesticides are sprayed on crops.

Kettleman City’s growing toxic web

Kettleman City just can’t catch a break. This predominately low-income, non-white, industrial community in Central California, profiled by Mother Jones last year for its unusually high rate of birth defects, is about to add another smokestack to its long list of major pollution sources: a 600-megawatt power plant that will be exempt from current federal air pollution regulations.

How is that possible? The current federal emissions standards for toxins such as carbon monoxide, lead, and sulfur dioxide were created by the Environmental Protection Agency while the permit application for the plant was still pending. The plant’s developer, Avenal Power Center, argued in court (PDF) that the agency should exempt it from the new standards. Earlier this year, the EPA signed off on its plan.

{ 0 comments }

West Fresno and Darling International

Residents living near this plant have suffered from its toxic and foul emissions for over 50 years. They demand that the Fresno City Council end the free permit this plant has enjoyed and require a Conditional Use Permit with full environmental review.

Big Ag demands right to pollute California’s Central Valley

The Los Angeles Times details a brewing skirmish over agricultural runoff being fought in California’s Central Valley. At issue are proposed regulations that would for the first time force farmers to address fertilizer and pesticide runoff from their fields. A group of environmental organizations is pushing for the regulations, as the L.A. Times reports:

CRPE Central Valley Tour April 2011

Center on Race, Poverty, and the Environment guided Bay Area residents around the Central Valley. They viewed environmental justice communities, some of the toxic pollution sources nearby, and spoke with local residents. Tour was in April of 2011.

California farmers, ecologists square off over drinking water pollution

Should farmers in the Central Valley, California’s richest agricultural region, be required to monitor and clean up groundwater pollution from their operations? The issue will be taken up by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board at a three-day meeting in Rancho Cordova beginning June 8.

Under the proposed regulations, farmland would be classified based on the contamination risk. Farms considered most likely to pollute groundwater would have to take certain steps to reduce fertilizer and other agricultural runoff. If passed, the new rules would affect 35,000 growers who work about 7 million acres of irrigated land.

Environmentalists faced off against farm groups in an all-day public hearing Thursday in Rancho Cordova. Farmers said that the regulations would be expensive and burdensome.  Environmental and community groups said that current rules don’t protect drinking water from pesticides, fertilizers and other agricultural runoff.

Contaminated drinking water in California’s Central Valley

Polluted aquifers in the San Joaquin Valley deprive dozens of communities of safe tap water. Switzer Fellow Carolina Balazs is working with local residents to help understand and address the problem. Produced by 2003 Switzer Fellow Jim Downing.

{ 0 comments }

Things can change: Kettleman City part IV

Kettleman City residents, especially those families touched by the tragedy of a child born with a birth defect, feel betrayed by health officials who failed to point the smoking gun at the single cause that brings such anxiety and misery to the natural and joyful event of childbirth. So is the Cal EPA look at what’s going on in Kettleman City over now?

It took years of effort and pressure on all sides, even from the governor and Barbara Boxer, to get Cal EPA to put significant effort into figuring out why 11 babies have been born with cleft palates and other birth abnormalities in the city since 2007.

What about living with the cumulative impacts of surrounding pollutants?

{ 0 comments }

Greenaction Spring 2011 campaign report

{ 0 comments }